Articles | Articles by Taylor

Taylor's Models

Models Can Be Helpful

Webster’s defines a “model” as a description or analogy used to help visualize something. In just such a manner, many models have been developed in an attempt to explain variations in human behavior. These include educational, learning style, leadership, social science, physiological, psychological, and thinking-style models, just to name a few. They can provide a framework from which to identify and discuss differences and similarities, a sort of short-hand language.

In their book, “The Art of Using Your Whole Brain,” authors Benziger and Sohn mention some of these models and correlate terminology with Benziger’s Working Model of Brain Function. Others have correlated Benziger’s brain-function terminology with a variety of models.

Examples of models include:

arrow

Benziger, Katherine I.

arrow

Cruise & Blitchington

arrow

Ennegram

arrow

Farley

arrow

Galen

arrow

Gregorc

arrow

Herrmann, Ned

arrow

Jung, Carl Gustav

arrow

Kleiner

arrow

Kolb, David

arrow

Leavitt

arrow

McCarthy

arrow

Moore-Gillette

arrow

Myers-Briggs

arrow

Native American Medicine Wheel

arrow

Performax Disc

arrow

Pribram, Carl

arrow

Rubin, Irv

arrow

Taylor, Arlene

arrow

Thompson

arrow

Thomas-Kilman

arrow

Wilson

Perhaps the greatest loss you can experience in life is the loss of who you were intended to be innately—and the authentic realness you never lived in all of its thriving fullness.

—Arlene Taylor


Taylor, Arlene

Taylor’s “Who Am I?” Model

Nothing in life is free. You always give something up to get something. The basic medium of exchange is energy (life force), not time or money or talent. The bottom line: you pay in energy! You are more likely to be healthy, happy, and successful, and live out your potential longevity, when the majority of your life’s activities match what your brain does easily.

There is a huge difference between what your brain has learned to do well and what it does energy efficiently! Evaluate how much a specific something (e.g., activity, task, relationship) costs in energy. Then decide if you want to give up that amount of energy in exchange.

Living authentically is energy efficient. In order to accomplish this, you need to identify who you are innately. The primary purpose of the "Who Am I?" Pyramid is to provide a framework for assisting you to identify your own innate giftedness. It can help to explain similarities and differences between individuals in a somewhat neutral and non-threatening language.

The focus of the "Who Am I?" Pyramid is on identifying, affirming, and living one's innate giftedness in order to manage energy expenditures more efficiently, enhance relationships, improve communication, increase success, and avoid or recover from Prolonged Adaption Stress Syndrome (PASS). Taylor’s model integrates and expands on work from a variety of researchers. Four key components are portrayed in the illustration below and descriptions for each layer follow.

Brain Gender Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual possesses in terms of a male style brain (systemizing), a female style brain (empathizing), or a balanced blend of both. Based on his/her innate brain, each person could be assigned a relative position on a metaphorical brain continuum.

Extroversion-Introversion Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual possesses in terms of an internal or external focus, including the type of environment conducive to learning. Based on his/her innate E-I ratio, each person could each be assigned a relative position on a metaphorical continuum. If the brain is subjected to chronic stress for several years or more, one’s position may be pushed temporarily toward introversion.

Sensory System Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual possesses in relation to sensory stimuli (visual, auditory, kinesthetic), including the type of sensory data that registers most quickly. Sensory preference impacts the way an individual takes in sensory data, his/her comfort level in any given situation, and the way in which he/she interacts with others and with the environment.

Thinking Process Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual possesses in relation to energy efficiency for processing information. It describes an innate biochemical advantage in one of four natural divisions of the cerebrum or thinking brain, and the way in which the brain pays attention to and manages data.

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Benziger, I. Katherine

Benziger’s Working Model of Brain Function

The focus is on validating and making effective use of all four cerebral modes and patterns. Benziger's model incorporates concepts of Extraversion/Introversion (e.g., Hans Eysenck) with a physiological update to the work of C. G. Jung, including additional information on Falsification of Type.

Brain Lead

Frontal Left (FL)
Direction and Decision-making

Frontal Right (FR)
Adaption and Internal Imaging

Basal Left (BL)
Stable Foundations and Routine

Basal Right (BR)
Peaceful, Harmonious Foundations and Feeling

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Cruise & Blitchington

Cruise & Blitchington’s Four Temperaments Model

(Thanks to Eugene Brewer PhD for correlation with cerebral function modes in his doctoral research project)

The focus is on a way to identify behaviors. Incorporates terminology from Galen and Hippocrates.

Choleric (FL)

Sanguine (FR)

Phlegmatic (BL)

Melancholy (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Enneagram

Enneagram compared with C.G. Jung and Benziger

(Thanks to I. Katherine Benziger PhD for correlation)

The focus is on a method of labeling and describing differences in behavior/thinking styles.

Enneagram Type

Carl Gustav Jung (per Riso)

I. Katherine Benziger

1.  The Reformer

Extroverted Thinker

Extroverted Frontal Left

2.  The Healer

Extroverted Feeler

Extroverted Basal Right

3.  The Status Seeker

No Explanation

Extreme Extroverts

4.  The Artist

Introverted Intuitive

Introverted Frontal Right

5.  The Thinker

Introverted Thinker

Introverted Frontal Left

6.  The Loyalist

Introverted Feeler

Introverted Basal Right

7.  The Generalist

Extroverted Sensation

Extroverted Basal Left

8.  The Leader

Extroverted Intuitive

Extroverted Frontal Right

9.  The Peacemaker

Introverted Sensation

Introverted Basal Left

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Farley, Frank

Frank Farley’s Thrill-Seeking Model

The focus is on exploring connection between creativity and criminality, among other things.

 

Big “T” – thrill-seeking, high stimulation needs, novelty, risk
(FR extroverted)

Little “T” – thrill avoiding, predictable, clarity, rigidity 
(BL introverted)

 

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Galen (circa 200 A.D.)

The Four Humors Model

The focus is on identifying behaviors. Incorporates terminology used by Hippocrates circa 500 B.C.

Choleric (FL)

Sanguine (Extroverted)

Phlegmatic (BL)

Melancholic (Introverted)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Gregorc, Anthony F.

Anthony F. Gregorc’s Learning Styles

The focus is on assisting teachers to understand and communicate with students more effectively.

Abstract Sequential (FL)

Abstract Random (FR)

Concrete Sequential (BL)

Concrete Random (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Herrmann, Ned

Ned Herrmann's Whole Brain Model 

The focus is on enhancing self understanding and enabling creative thinking through the use of his metaphorical whole brain model. "Because this is a metaphorical model and not a clinical one, it permits us to make selected applications while a precise clinical model is still decades from perfection. The metaphoric Whole Brain Model provides a useful and valid basis for determining thinking style preferences lacking a location-specific, precise physiological construct." (The Whole Brain Business Book by Ned Hermann, page 18).

Upper Left or Left Cerebral (FL)

Upper Right or Right Cererbral (FR)

Lower Left or Left Limbic (BL)

Lower Right or Right Limbic (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Jung, Carl Gustav

Jung’s Four Functions Model

Thinking Function (FL)

Intuition Function (FR)

Sensing Function (BL)

Feeling Function (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Kleiner, Brian H.

Kleiner’s Tuning into Temperaments Model  

Science Oriented Thinking (Double Frontal)   Artistic-Sensation-Perceiving (FR)  
Responsible Judging (BL)   Feeling Function (BR)  

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Thomas-Kilman

Thomas-Kilman’s Conflict Styles Inventory Model

The focus is on enabling people to collaborate more effectively to resolve conflicts.

Competition (FL and extreme extrovert)  

Avoidance (FR and extreme introvert)  

Compromise (BL)

Accommodation (BR)

Collaboration (Double Right or BR)  

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Kolb, David A.

David A. Kolb’s Learning Styles

The focus is on assisting teachers to understand and communicate with students more effectively.

Abstract Conceptualization (FL)

Active Experimentation (FR)

Reflective Observation (BL)

Concrete Experience (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Leavitt, Harold

Leavitt’s Executive Styles Model – In Praise of Pathfinders

The focus is on identifying excellent leaders

Problem Solver (FL)
Implementer (Double Left)
Pathfinder (FR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


McCarthy, Bernice

McCarthy's 4MAT Model 

(Thanks to Eugene Brewer PhD for correlation with Benziger terminology of four cerebral modes)

The focus is on assisting teachers to teach to all learning styles. While in a learner's strong areas, s/he shines. While in a learner's weaker areas, s/he is stretched to develop, thus becoming whole-brain learning.

Quadrant 2 (FL) Analytic Learner. Scholar, loves school, research, what do the experts think? Asks the question, "What?" Quadrant 4 (FR) Dynamic Learner. Intuitive learner, often gets right answer but does not know how. Risk taker. Makes whatever is working, work better. Asks the question, "If?" or "What if?"
Quadrant 3 (BL) Common Sense Learner. Kinesthetic oriented, needs to move. Bottom line.  Asks the question, "How does this work?" Quadrant 1 (BR) Imaginative Learner Great Ideas, people oriented. Filters new learning through past experience. Asks the question, "Why?"

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Moore-Gillette

Robert Moore and Douglas Gillette’s Masculine Types Model

The focus is on identifying four dominant archetypes guiding male growth and development.

Warrior (FL) Magician (FR)
King (BL) Lover (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Myers-Briggs

MBTI Model

The focus is on implementing Jung’s Model

MBTI Value

Benziger Terminology

Thinking (T)

Frontal Left

Sensing (S)

Basal Left

Feeling (F)

Basal Right

Intuition (N)

Frontal Right

Extroversion (E)

Extroversion

Introversion (I)

Introversion

None

Balanced E:I

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Native American Medicine Wheel Model

The focus is on conveying a symbolic, metaphoric understanding of life.

North, Buffalo (FL) East, Illumination (FR)
West, Bear (BL) South, Innocence/Trust (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Performax Disc

Performanx’s Disc Model

Dominance (Double frontal and extroverted)
Compliance (Double left and introverted)
Steadiness (Double basal and introverted)
Influencing others (Double right and extroverted)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Pribram, Carl

Proposed physiological bases or psychological relevance model

The focus is on natural functional brain lead.

Left Frontal Lobe (FL) Right Frontal Lobe (FR)
Left Posterior Cortical Convexity (BL) Right Posterior Cortical Convexity (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Rubin, Irv

Irv Rubin’s Influence Styles Model

The focus is on helping leaders to be more effective by expanding choice of:

Reason with logic (FL) Attract with visions (FR)
Assert established goals (BL) Bridge with other people (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Thompson, Irwin

Irwin Thompson’s Archetypes in History Model

The focus is on theoretical insights.

Hunter – military general (FL) Fool – leader in impossible situations (FR)
Leader - administrative Leader (BL) Shaman – Spiritual leader (BR)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


Wilson

Wilson Learning System’s Social Styles Model

The focus is on increased selling and influencing skills.

Driver (Double Frontal, Extroverted)
Analytic (Double Left, Introverted)
Amiable (Basal Right, Introverted)
Expressive (Frontal Right, Extroverted)

 

Top of PageTop of Page


 

Copyright, 1999-2008, by Realizations, Inc. All rights reserved.
Web design by Hegarty Services
Privacy Policy