Models Can Be Helpful
Websters
defines a model as a description or analogy used to help
visualize something. In just such a manner, many models have been
developed in an attempt to explain variations in human behavior. These
include educational, learning style, leadership, social science, physiological,
psychological, and thinking-style models, just to name a few. They
can provide a framework from which to identify and discuss differences
and similarities, a sort of short-hand language.
In their book, The Art of Using Your Whole Brain,
authors Benziger and Sohn mention some of these models and correlate
terminology with Benzigers Working Model of Brain Function.
Others have correlated Benzigers brain-function terminology
with a variety of models.
Examples of models
include:
|

Perhaps the greatest loss you can experience in life is the loss of who you were intended to be innately—and the authentic realness you never lived in all of its thriving fullness.
—Arlene Taylor |
Taylor, Arlene
Taylors Who Am I? Model
Nothing in life is free.
You always give something up to get something. The basic medium of
exchange is energy (life force), not time or money or talent. The
bottom line: you pay in energy! You are more likely to be healthy,
happy, and successful, and live out your potential longevity, when
the majority of your life’s activities match what your brain
does easily.
There is a huge difference between what your brain has learned to
do well and what it does energy efficiently! Evaluate how much a specific
something (e.g., activity, task, relationship) costs in energy.
Then decide if you want to give up that amount of energy in exchange.
Living authentically is energy efficient. In order to accomplish
this, you need to identify who you are innately. The primary purpose
of the "Who Am I?" Pyramid is to provide
a framework for assisting you to identify your own innate giftedness.
It can help to explain similarities and differences between individuals
in a somewhat neutral and non-threatening language.
The focus of the "Who Am I?" Pyramid is
on identifying, affirming, and living one's innate giftedness in order
to manage energy expenditures more efficiently, enhance relationships,
improve communication, increase success, and avoid or recover from
Prolonged Adaption Stress Syndrome (PASS). Taylor’s model integrates
and expands on work from a variety of researchers. Four key components
are portrayed in the illustration below and descriptions for each
layer follow.

 |
Brain
Gender Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual
possesses in terms of a male style brain (systemizing), a female
style brain (empathizing), or a balanced blend of both. Based
on his/her innate brain, each person could be assigned a relative
position on a metaphorical brain continuum.
|
 |
Extroversion-Introversion
Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual
possesses in terms of an internal or external focus, including
the type of environment conducive to learning. Based on his/her
innate E-I ratio, each person could each be assigned a relative
position on a metaphorical continuum. If the brain is subjected
to chronic stress for several years or more, one’s position
may be pushed temporarily toward introversion. |
 |
Sensory
System Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual
possesses in relation to sensory stimuli (visual, auditory,
kinesthetic), including the type of sensory data that registers
most quickly. Sensory preference impacts the way an individual
takes in sensory data, his/her comfort level in any given situation,
and the way in which he/she interacts with others and with the
environment. |
 |
Thinking
Process Preference
This component refers to the type of brain an individual possesses
in relation to energy efficiency for processing information.
It describes an innate biochemical advantage in one of four
natural divisions of the cerebrum or thinking brain, and the
way in which the brain pays attention to and manages data. |
Top
of Page
Benziger, I. Katherine
Benzigers Working Model of Brain Function
The focus is on validating and making effective use
of all four cerebral modes and patterns. Benziger's model incorporates
concepts of Extraversion/Introversion (e.g., Hans Eysenck) with a
physiological update to the work of C. G. Jung, including additional
information on Falsification of Type.
Brain Lead
| Frontal
Left (FL)
Direction and Decision-making |
Frontal
Right (FR)
Adaption and Internal Imaging |
| Basal
Left (BL)
Stable Foundations and Routine |
Basal
Right (BR)
Peaceful, Harmonious Foundations and Feeling |
Top
of Page
Cruise & Blitchington
Cruise & Blitchingtons Four Temperaments
Model
(Thanks
to Eugene Brewer PhD for correlation with
cerebral function modes in his doctoral research project)
The focus is on
a way to identify behaviors. Incorporates terminology from Galen and
Hippocrates.
| Choleric
(FL) |
Sanguine
(FR) |
| Phlegmatic
(BL) |
Melancholy
(BR) |
Top
of Page
Enneagram
Enneagram compared with C.G. Jung and Benziger
(Thanks
to I. Katherine Benziger PhD for correlation)
The focus is on
a method of labeling and describing differences in behavior/thinking
styles.
| Enneagram
Type |
Carl
Gustav Jung (per Riso) |
I.
Katherine Benziger |
| 1. The Reformer |
Extroverted
Thinker |
Extroverted
Frontal Left |
| 2. The Healer |
Extroverted
Feeler |
Extroverted
Basal Right |
| 3. The Status Seeker |
No
Explanation |
Extreme
Extroverts |
| 4. The Artist |
Introverted
Intuitive |
Introverted
Frontal Right |
| 5. The Thinker |
Introverted
Thinker |
Introverted
Frontal Left |
| 6. The Loyalist |
Introverted
Feeler |
Introverted
Basal Right |
| 7. The Generalist |
Extroverted
Sensation |
Extroverted
Basal Left |
| 8. The Leader |
Extroverted
Intuitive |
Extroverted
Frontal Right |
| 9. The Peacemaker |
Introverted
Sensation |
Introverted
Basal Left |
Top
of Page
Farley, Frank
Frank Farleys Thrill-Seeking Model
The focus is on
exploring connection between creativity and criminality, among other
things.
| |
Big
T thrill-seeking, high stimulation needs,
novelty, risk
(FR extroverted) |
| Little
T thrill avoiding, predictable, clarity,
rigidity
(BL introverted) |
|
Top
of Page
Galen (circa 200 A.D.)
The Four Humors Model
The focus is on
identifying behaviors. Incorporates terminology used by Hippocrates
circa 500 B.C.
| Choleric
(FL) |
Sanguine
(Extroverted) |
| Phlegmatic
(BL) |
Melancholic
(Introverted) |
Top
of Page
Gregorc, Anthony F.
Anthony F. Gregorcs Learning Styles
The focus is on
assisting teachers to understand and communicate with students more
effectively.
| Abstract
Sequential (FL) |
Abstract
Random (FR) |
| Concrete
Sequential (BL) |
Concrete
Random (BR) |
Top
of Page
Herrmann, Ned
Ned Herrmann's Whole Brain
Model
The focus is on enhancing self understanding and enabling
creative thinking through the use of his metaphorical whole brain
model. "Because this is a metaphorical model and not a clinical
one, it permits us to make selected applications while a precise clinical
model is still decades from perfection. The metaphoric Whole Brain
Model provides a useful and valid basis for determining thinking style
preferences lacking a location-specific, precise physiological construct."
(The Whole Brain Business Book by Ned Hermann, page 18).
| Upper Left or Left
Cerebral (FL) |
Upper Right or Right
Cererbral (FR) |
| Lower Left or Left
Limbic (BL) |
Lower Right or Right
Limbic (BR) |
Top
of Page
Jung, Carl Gustav
Jungs Four Functions
Model
|
Thinking Function (FL) |
Intuition
Function (FR) |
| Sensing
Function (BL) |
Feeling
Function (BR) |
Top
of Page
Kleiner, Brian H.
Kleiners
Tuning into Temperaments
Model
| Science
Oriented Thinking (Double Frontal) |
Artistic-Sensation-Perceiving
(FR) |
| Responsible
Judging (BL) |
Feeling
Function (BR) |
Top
of Page
Thomas-Kilman
Thomas-Kilmans
Conflict Styles Inventory Model
The focus is on
enabling people to collaborate more effectively to resolve conflicts.
| Competition
(FL and extreme extrovert) |
Avoidance
(FR and extreme introvert) |
| Compromise
(BL) |
Accommodation
(BR)
Collaboration
(Double Right or BR) |
Top
of Page
Kolb, David
A.
David A. Kolbs Learning Styles
The focus is on
assisting teachers to understand and communicate with students more
effectively.
| Abstract
Conceptualization (FL) |
Active
Experimentation (FR) |
| Reflective
Observation (BL) |
Concrete
Experience (BR) |
Top
of Page
Leavitt,
Harold
Leavitts Executive Styles Model In Praise of Pathfinders
The focus is on
identifying excellent leaders
| Problem
Solver (FL) |
| Implementer
(Double Left) |
| Pathfinder
(FR) |
Top
of Page
McCarthy,
Bernice
McCarthy's 4MAT Model
(Thanks
to Eugene Brewer PhD for correlation with Benziger terminology of
four cerebral modes)
The focus is on
assisting teachers to teach to all learning styles. While in a learner's
strong areas, s/he shines. While in a learner's weaker areas, s/he
is stretched to develop, thus becoming whole-brain learning.
| Quadrant
2 (FL) Analytic Learner. Scholar, loves school, research, what
do the experts think? Asks the question, "What?" |
Quadrant
4 (FR) Dynamic Learner. Intuitive learner, often gets right answer
but does not know how. Risk taker. Makes whatever is working,
work better. Asks the question, "If?" or "What
if?" |
| Quadrant
3 (BL) Common Sense Learner. Kinesthetic oriented, needs to move.
Bottom line. Asks
the question, "How does this work?" |
Quadrant
1 (BR) Imaginative Learner Great Ideas, people oriented. Filters
new learning through past experience. Asks the question, "Why?" |
Top
of Page
Moore-Gillette
Robert Moore and Douglas Gillettes Masculine Types Model
The focus is on
identifying four dominant archetypes guiding male growth and development.
| Warrior
(FL) |
Magician
(FR) |
| King
(BL) |
Lover
(BR) |
Top
of Page
Myers-Briggs
MBTI Model
The focus is on
implementing Jungs Model
MBTI
Value |
Benziger
Terminology |
Thinking
(T) |
Frontal
Left |
Sensing
(S) |
Basal
Left |
Feeling
(F) |
Basal
Right |
Intuition
(N) |
Frontal
Right |
Extroversion
(E) |
Extroversion |
Introversion
(I) |
Introversion |
None |
Balanced
E:I |
Top
of Page
Native
American Medicine Wheel Model
The focus is on
conveying a symbolic, metaphoric understanding of life.
| North,
Buffalo (FL) |
East,
Illumination (FR) |
| West,
Bear (BL) |
South,
Innocence/Trust (BR) |
Top
of Page
Performax
Disc
Performanxs Disc Model
| Dominance
(Double frontal and extroverted) |
| Compliance
(Double left and introverted) |
| Steadiness
(Double basal and introverted) |
| Influencing
others (Double right and extroverted) |
Top
of Page
Pribram,
Carl
Proposed physiological bases
or psychological relevance model
The focus is on natural functional brain lead.
| Left
Frontal Lobe (FL) |
Right
Frontal Lobe (FR) |
| Left
Posterior Cortical Convexity (BL) |
Right
Posterior Cortical Convexity (BR) |
Top
of Page
Rubin,
Irv
Irv Rubins Influence Styles Model
The focus is on
helping leaders to be more effective by expanding choice of:
| Reason
with logic (FL) |
Attract
with visions (FR) |
| Assert
established goals (BL) |
Bridge
with other people (BR) |
Top
of Page
Thompson,
Irwin
Irwin Thompsons Archetypes in History Model
The focus is on
theoretical insights.
| Hunter
military general (FL) |
Fool
leader in impossible situations (FR) |
| Leader
- administrative Leader (BL) |
Shaman
Spiritual leader (BR) |
Top
of Page
Wilson
Wilson Learning Systems Social Styles Model
The focus is on
increased selling and influencing skills.
| Driver
(Double Frontal, Extroverted) |
| Analytic
(Double Left, Introverted) |
| Amiable
(Basal Right, Introverted) |
| Expressive
(Frontal Right, Extroverted) |
Top
of Page
|